Newsletter October 2015

Newsletter October 2015


 

BACKGROUND CHECKS: ARE THEY REALLY ALLOWED TO DO THAT?

Ty Hyderally, Esq.October 2015 Newsletter

Many prospective employers conduct background checks on applicants as a routine part of their hiring and vetting process. The background checks are generally performed by outside companies that are hired by employers to “vet” individuals that the employer is considering for employment. Depending on the employer and the nature of the position for which the applicant is being considered, the employer may request reports about an applicant’s driving record, criminal record, and/or credit history. Of these reports, criminal records are most often sought by potential employers. See N.J.S.A. 34:6B-12 (“Criminal background checks by employers have increased dramatically in recent years, with estimates of 90 percent of large employers in the United States now conducting background checks as part of the hiring process.”); National Consumer Law Center, available at http://www.nclc.org/issues/broken-records.html (citing a 2010 Society for Human Resource Management survey). Thus, job seekers with criminal records face an additional hurdle in their path to employment.

New Jersey law gives employers the right to request and obtain information about an applicant’s criminal record. New Jersey Administrative Code (N.J.A.C.) 13:59-1, et seq., authorizes the dissemination of New Jersey criminal history record information by the State Bureau of Identification (SBI) of the New Jersey State Police Identification & Information Technology Section, for noncriminal justice purposes. This regulation authorizes any potential employer, be it governmental or private, to obtain a very broad range of information about an applicant’s criminal record for the purpose of assessing the applicant’s suitability for employment. The regulation authorizes employers to “obtain from the SBI all records of convictions in the New Jersey state courts and, regardless of their age, all records of pending arrests and charges for violations of New Jersey laws, unless such records have been expunged.” Thus, employers can obtain an applicant’s criminal record, excluding only arrests that have already been adjudicated and did not result in a conviction.

Given the above, it is important that job seekers with criminal records are aware of their rights and any limits on employers’ rights to obtain and use their records. The New Jersey regulation requires that employers submit the applicant’s signed consent before obtaining that person’s criminal record. Also, the employer must give the applicant adequate notice and reasonable time to confirm or deny the accuracy of the information in the report, before taking adverse action based on that information. See N.J.A.C. 13:59-1.2. At the federal level, the protections of the Fair Credit Reporting Act apply to criminal background checks on potential employees as well. See 15 USC §1681a (d)(1)(B).

Additionally, a blanket policy of rejecting all applicants with a criminal record has been found to raise Title VII concerns. Because arrest rates are significantly higher for African Americans and Latinos, using criminal records as a bar to employment would have a disparate impact on members of those protected groups. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued guidelines stating that an employer should examine the nature and gravity of the criminal offense or conduct, how much time has passed since the offense or sentence, and the nature of the job (how much supervision the employee will receive, etc.), when determining the impact of the criminal record on the applicant’s suitability for employment. See EEOC Enforcement Guidance, Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, available at http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm. The EEOC has also said that employers should give applicants an opportunity to explain the circumstances surrounding their criminal history and provide mitigating information showing that the employee should not be excluded based on the offense. See id.

Job seekers with criminal records received some relief in March 2015, when the Opportunity to Compete Act, otherwise known as the “Ban the Box Law,” went into effect. The Act prohibits employers from inquiring about an applicant’s criminal record, “during the initial employment application process.” N.J.S.A. 34:6B-14. The Act further defines the “initial employment application process” to end after an “employer has conducted a first interview.” N.J.S.A. 34:6B-13. Thus, an employer is effectively barred from asking about an applicant’s criminal record on any initial job application, or during the applicant’s first interview. No longer will employers be able to screen out and exclude applicants with criminal records by means of a check box on a job application. While employers are still allowed to inquire about applicants’ criminal records, applicants will at least have the opportunity to present themselves to the employer before inquiries into their criminal record are allowed.

Some job seekers will be able to avail themselves of the expungement process to effectively erase their criminal record, as discussed in the article below.

By Isaac Graff and Jennifer Vorih, Esq.

 
 

NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT DENIES REQUEST TO EXPUNGE ONE CONVICTION FOR TWO CRIMINAL EVENTS

Ty Hyderally, Esq.

Expungements are an important tool for job seekers with a criminal record. Most prospective employers run a background check on an applicant’s criminal history when determining his or her suitability for the position. At first glance, a criminal record of any kind does not reflect well on a job applicant. As a result, it behooves any job seeker with a criminal record to try to have the offense expunged.

For most purposes, expungement accomplishes that, “the arrest, conviction and any proceedings related thereto shall be deemed not to have occurred.” N.J.S.A. 2C:52-27. To be granted expungement, a person must file a Petition for Expungement with the courts. N.J.S.A. 2C:52-1 to -32. If the expungement is granted, ”criminal records are extracted and isolated, but not destroyed.” In re Expungement Petition of J.S., 2015 N.J. LEXIS 821, *25 (N.J. Aug. 10, 2015).

The intent of the Legislature in enacting the expungement statutes was clear: “The purpose of this act is to assist only those persons who have one single conviction against them, and from the time of the conviction and for a period of ten years thereafter have lived exemplary lives during that time and are able to show by their petition that they have made a complete moral change.” Sponsor's Statement to Assemb. 293 (Feb. 10, 1936). To that end, the New Jersey Legislature has consistently strived to limit expungement to offenders who have committed no more than an isolated infraction in an otherwise law-abiding life. As originally enacted in 1931, and as amended in 1936, the statute required that the offender have been convicted only once, and that “no subsequent conviction has been entered against” the offender.

The statute was amended in 1979 and again in 2010. In 2010, the Legislature limited the availability of expungement to offenders who have not “been convicted of any prior or subsequent crime,” in place of the former requirement that “no subsequent conviction has been entered against” the petitioner (see, e.g., N.J.S.A. 2A:164-28 (repealed 1979)). Thus, the statute now focuses on prohibiting expungement of multiple “crimes,” as opposed to multiple “convictions.”

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently interpreted the statute’s amended language to prohibit expungement in cases involving multiple offenses committed over a short period of time and adjudicated in a single conviction, in In re Expungement Petition of J.S., 2015 N.J. LEXIS 821, *27 (N.J. Aug. 10, 2015). The Court ruled that multiple crimes, even if they result in a single sentencing and conviction date, will bar a petitioner from expungement. In the matter of In re Expungement Petition of J.S., J.S. was caught selling small quantities of marijuana two times in a span of five days. The two offenses resulted in one judgement of conviction. The Appellate Division ruled and the Supreme Court affirmed that despite J.S.’s arguments that his multiple offenses should be considered one crime spree, each one was in fact a “separate criminal event,” and thus, J.S. was precluded from expungement because he had been “convicted of a prior or subsequent crime.” Had the standard still been one conviction, J.S. would not have been precluded from expungement.

Unless the Legislature further amends the statute, any two crimes, no matter how similar or close in time, will preclude a petitioner from having her or his record expunged, unless the acts are “part of a single, uninterrupted criminal event.” Id.

By Isaac Graff and Jennifer Vorih, Esq.

 
 

EEOC GUIDELINES: CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS AND TITLE VII

Ty Hyderally, Esq.

As part of its effort to “eliminate unlawful discrimination in employment screening, for hiring or retention, by entities covered by Title VII,” the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) issued an Enforcement Guidance on April 25, 2012, regarding employers’ use of arrest or conviction records, in making employment decisions. EEOC Enforcement Guidance, Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records in Employment Decisions Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, available at http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/guidance/arrest_conviction.cfm. This Enforcement Guidance reinforced long-standing EEOC guidance “applying Title VII principles to employers' use of criminal records to screen for employment.” Id. The EEOC recognized that providing guidance in this area was more imperative in recent times than ever before, because there has been a significant increase in the number of Americans who have had contact with the criminal justice system over the past twenty years. See id. As a result, the number of people with criminal records in the working-age population has increased dramatically.

The EEOC enforces Title VII, which prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. Having a criminal record is not a protected class under Title VII. Therefore, whether an employer's reliance on a criminal record to deny employment violates Title VII depends on whether it is part of employment discrimination based on one of the protected classes. Id.

Title VII liability for employment discrimination can be based on one of two analytic frameworks: "disparate treatment" and "disparate impact." Id. Disparate treatment in the use of criminal records in the employee screening process is found in the classic discrimination scenario, wherein an “employer rejected an African American applicant based on his criminal record but hired a similarly situated White applicant with a comparable criminal record.” Id.

Disparate impact, in contrast, is found where an employer’s policy has the effect of disproportionately screening out a Title VII-protected group. Id. (citing Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971)). If a policy is found to have a disparate impact, the employer must “demonstrate that the policy or practice is job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity,” or it will violate Title VII. Id.

National data has shown that African Americans and Hispanics are more likely to have criminal records than Whites. See id. In 2010, 28% of all arrests were of African Americans, even though African Americans only comprised approximately 14% of the general population. Id. In 2008, Hispanics were arrested for federal drug charges at a rate of approximately three times their proportion of the general population. Id. The rates of incarceration of African Americans and Hispanics are also disproportionate to their numbers in the general population. The U.S. Department of Justice estimated in 2001 that 1 out of every 17 White men is expected to go to prison at some point during his lifetime. For Hispanics, the rate climbs to 1 in 6 and for African Americans, to 1 in 3. Id.

The EEOC has determined, based on the above data, that blanket exclusions on job applicants with criminal records have a disparate impact based on race and national origin, and thus may violate Title VII. Id. The onus is then on the employer to show that in the employer’s particular geographic there is no disparate impact, or that a “business necessity” exists for the policy.

By Isaac Graff and Jennifer Vorih, Esq.

 

These articles are for informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, and may not reasonably be relied upon as such. If you face a legal issue, you should consult a qualified attorney for independent legal advice with regard to your particular set of facts. This newsletter may constitute attorney advertising. This newsletter is not intended to communicate with anyone in a state or other jurisdiction where such a newsletter may fail to comply with all laws and ethical rules of that state of jurisdiction.

  • “I want to sincerely thank you and your staff for your resolve and professional zeal in resolving my issues with [company name removed for privacy reasons]. I especially want to thank Rob Szyba who handled these proceedings with dignity and a great deal of knowledge and professionalism. He knows what buttons to push and when to push them. He is an asset to your organization. I will gladly recommend your services to anyone in need. It was a privilege to deal with you and your team.”
    J.B.
  • “It has been my pleasure to work with Ty through the ABA's Employment Rights and Responsibilities Committee. His contributions to the Committee have been significant due to his knowledge of employment law and his tireless devotion to teaching trial skills. His service to the profession and his clients is commendable.”
    Paula Ardelean
  • “Ty is dedicated to his work and his clients. He knows his stuff, and he goes the extra mile to do the best job possible. Ty is a pleasure to work with!”
    Piper Hoffman
  • “It is with pleasure that I recommend Ty. He is a tireless advocate on behalf of employees and their concerns. His efforts are demonstrated not only in his practice, but also in his exceptional additional efforts to represent this community in professional associations, such as the ABA. He has the knowledge base and the tireless effort that makes working with him productive, but always enjoyable too.”
    Darlene Vorachek
  • “I have worked with Ty on several legal presentations. I represent employers, and Ty has invited me to participate as a panelist representing employers' perspectives on labor and employment matters. Ty is always well-prepared and very knowledgeable about developments in employment law, and is always a pleasure to work with.”
    Chris Dalton
  • “Ty is an excellent lawyer who completely understands the legal process and does everything in his power to help his clients. He was a pleasure to work with and would recommend him to anyone seeking his expertise.”
    Joseph Alvaro
  • “Ty is a widely recognized expert in the area of employment law. His aggressive representation of clients is backed up by an extraordinary breadth of knowledge and attention to detail.”
    Edward Kopelson
  • “I have known Ty professionally for more than two years. He is nationally recognized as one of the best employment attorney's in the country and I know his practice will continue to grow!”
    Betsy Zaplin
  • “ - Ty was a great help for my associate and I during litigation. He showed the highest degree of professionalism and did in fact help us to achieve the best end result possible. Mr. Hyderally comes highly recommended.”
    Christopher Power
  • “Ty is an exceptional attorney. Ty strives for and attains great results, in a fair and ethical manner. I value his professionalism, integrity and creativity. His ability to relate to the client and colleagues on various levels makes him very personable and a real asset.”
    Betty MacKnight
  • “Ty Hyderally is a light of hope at times when all seems grim and hopeless. A brilliant lawyer focused on labor and business law. Mr. Hyderally has the ability to combine his knowledge of the law with economic sense, strategic thinking and level headed decision making that more often than not results in a sensible conclusion that ultimately equates to a positive result for his client. Mr Hyderally is a pleasure to work with and a person you would want to have on your side of the table.”
    Richard Sapienza
  • “I have known Ty Hyderally and his firm for a number of years through our shared affiliation with the National Employment Lawyers Association. Ty has consistently impressed me both with his leadership qualities as well as the quality of workmanship that he and his firm generate. I have reviewed some of his firm's work product, including a sample initial client letter, which not only contained excellent advice to new clients but also included cutting edge information as to how to properly address social networking issues. Without hesitation, I would highly recommend Ty Hyderally.”
    Fred Shahrooz Scampato
  • “I would highly recommend the Law Office of Ty Hyderally to anyone who is in need of representation in a legal matter. Ty is one of the most knowledgeable and professional individuals that I have ever met. He not only protected my rights, but also added a personal touch in his approach which helped in relieving some of the stress of my situation. He is a hard working, kind hearted individual who goes out of his way to make your problem his and provides great results in the end.”
    Mike Fischer
  • “What impressed me most about Ty was that he delivered exactly what he promised! Very well versed in his area of practice, and extremely respected by his peers and colleagues, which put me at ease knowing he was representing me! Thank you Ty!”
    Dan Verdun
  • “I have been involved with Ty Hyderally both as an adversary in employment litigation, and when I have acted as a Court appointed Mediator in employment litigation matters in which Ty represented plaintiffs. In both types of situations, he has represented his clients very well, with an excellent command of the issues, and he has shown himself to be well-prepared, reliable, and sensitive to the concerns of his clients. He has conducted himself in a highly professional manner at all times. I have referred potential plaintiffs in employment matters to him (I represent management/defendants in such matters), since I believe he is highly qualified to consider their circumstances.”
    Wayne Positan
  • “Ty helped us in my small business with a very delicate matter involving what was once a very cherished employee who had made some bad choices. Because it was also emotional for me and my management team, we valued the professionalism and expertise that Ty offered. It was comforting to know we could rely on his service through that very challenging time and handle it with compassion and in compliance with the law. I would use him again and recommend him wholeheartedly!”
    Sherry Blair
  • “Ty is detail oriented yet moves quickly to get results. He contemplates each step and what action should be taken. Ty looks out for his client's best interest and is available to talk during evening hours when it is more appropriate to discuss options to take from home. Also, Ty is expedient in getting information needed in order to be cognizant of finances. I highly recommend Ty for legal services, especially with employment law.”
    Jeff Martens
  • “If the opportunity arises where a "name brand" attorney is needed, then Ty Hyderally is the only choice. Those in the know are aware that his record of success for his clients is outstanding and that his knowledge of his field is way above the rest”
    Jeff Baron
  • “Ty Hyderally is a lawyer's lawyer. I, also, used to handle plaintiffs' employment cases, but over time, those cases became more and more complicated and costly to pursue. They began to require the attention of a legal specialist. I decided against handling them personally. I was delighted when I met Ty. Now, I refer people to him all the time. I know that he will give the best advice and get the best results possible. I hope my employees don't have his card.”
  • “Many of my executive clients need to negotiate employment contracts or employment confilcts with their employer. As an executive coach, I support their efforts in all domains of their lives including recommending a lawyer when they have these employment contractual needs, I recommend Ty. Not once have I had any negative feedback from any client and all of my dealings with him have been very satisfying.”
    Dan McNeill
  • “Ty is a very knowledgeable Attorney, who has demonstrated a very proven track record in handling Employment cases. His knowledge and assertive approach have made him a very successful Attorney.”
    John Mcnamara
  • “I actually first worked with Ty at McKenna McIlwain LLP in 2008. Already I was impressed by his professionalism, client list and reputation. In 2011 I moved back to Montclair after a few years back home in Oregon. Ty was in need of a temporary administrative assistant and invited me to join his team at their new, independent location. I learned a great deal working with Hyderally & Associates, P.C. They have earned their reputation as the hardest hitting, best representation available for employment matters in New Jersey and New York alike. They are attentive, fair, and go every extra mile to ensure due diligence. I am proud to have them on my resume and am happy for the experience of being part of such a busy, professional and fast paced team.”
    Mary Otte
  • “Ty secured settlements that were nothing less than outstanding for my clients/contacts that I have referred to him. The quick speed with which he achieved his results was a huge bonus to those clients.”
    Robert Kornitzer
  • “I have worked with Ty for years through the ABA Labor & Employment Law Section Employment Rights and Responsibilities Committee. Ty is a go-to source for exemplary presentations on trial practice. A tireless advocate for employee rights, Ty is an accomplished trial attorney and someone we can rely on and have repeatedly relied upon in mock trial presentations at our yearly conferences.”
    John Beasley
  • “Ty is a regular lecturer at continuing education programs for lawyers. This means that because of his abilities he is called upon to enhance the skills of lawyers who are already experienced. He is well regarded as a trial lawyer and as a provider of legal advice to clients. I find that his companionable persona makes it easier to accept and understand his thoughts and advice.”
    Arnie Pedowitz
  • “I have known Ty Hyderally for several years and can only describe him as an expert in all areas of Employment law. I have referred several people to him in connection with their legal concerns and on each occasion I have been met with very positive feedback from these individuals and businesses. I have personally sought his counsel relating to a variety of business strategy issues within my own Insurance practice. With his substantial experience and proven track record, I wholeheartedly recommend his services.”
    Matthew McGovern, Esq.
  • “Ty has represented me numerous times and I have always come out with positive results. He keeps you well informed at each step of the process and always makes you feel confident and secure. I highly recommend his services.”
    John Scardino Jr
  • “Ty and I worked at the same law firm Friedman Siegelbaum. I found him a pleasure to work with and an able and diligent attorney.”
    Joel Glucksman
  • “If ever someone needs an exceptional employment litigator, Ty is the first person that I think of. Not only is he incredibly intelligent, but he is able to craft litigation strategies to maximize his client's outcome. He is a relentless litigator, with great passion for his work. If you hire Ty, you will not be disappointed.”
    Noah B. Rosenfarb, CPA, ABV, PFS, CDFA
  • “Ty has been invaluable to me as a business owner with employee issues. His advice has been on point and redirected me in the midst of employee concerns. I would highly recommend him and his firm whenever you have employment concerns.”
    Philip Seaver
  • “If you are looking for one of the best attorney's in an employment related issue, look no further. Ty is national recognized as one of the best employment attorney in the country and I am thrilled to see his practice continue to grow!”
    Jon Lamkin
  • “Ty, has been a great help to me in times of need when I needed his advice on some business matters. He is always available 24-7 to help out whether it is a small/large task. I would highly recommend him and his firm in any legal matter that he specializes in.”
    Eric Reinstein
  • “I have been working with Ty for over 4 years. Ty is one person I would say pays attention to detail, works hard for his clients and gets the job done on time and with amazing results. I have referred clients to him and he has always given them star treatment was always up front and honest with them and they are so pleased with their outcomes and glad I made the introduction.”
    Carmen Bucco
  • “Ty was an adversary and never lost sight of his client's needs in seeking a resolution. I would not hesitate to recommend for plaintiffs in employment work. He is methodical and tenacious but fair and amenable to a just resolution.”
    Roger Jacobs
  • “My Husband and I hired Ty at a time when we thought all was lost. We had a different attorney on our case that just gave up on us. My husband contacted Ty and once he heard our case he immediately took action. Our case was settled within 3 months of Ty taking over. His experience and knowledge of employment laws are not only impressive but it is why he is very successful. Ty is also very compassionate about his clients and communicated with us every step of the way. I would recommend Ty Hyderally to anyone and everyone who is need of a great attorney. You too!! Will be satisfied.”
    Cynthia Ortiz
  • “I have referred clients to Ty for employment issues. They told me that Ty was knowledgeable, courteous and promptly handled their matters. I can easily recommend Ty for people with difficult employment cases.”
    Eileen Kohutis
  • “Working with Ty on various projects has been fantastic. He and his team are thorough and they understand how to get the job done correctly. When you have the chance to work with Ty you understand the meaning of not taking no for an answer. They work to understand clients needs and the resolve the issues at hand. I have seen firsthand what Ty and his associates bring to the table and I would recommend them to anyone needing assistance with employment law.”
    Darren Magarro
  • “I have worked with Ty Hyderally on the executive board of the New Jersey chapter of the National Employment Lawyers Association, and have discussed various employment matters with him. He is an excellent leader, always coming up with new ideas. Ty is truly an expert in employment law and I have found his analysis of both complex and simple matters to be dead on.”
    Leslie A. Farber
  • "Ty and I have worked together on a case getting ready for trial. We have also worked on trial advocacy presentations for the ABA. Ty is a very experienced litigator. He has great trial skills and connects well with his clients, the court and jury. He blends a sense of humor with knowledge of the law and facts. He is a very effective advocate.”
    Vanessa Kelly